Real estate agent · Watertown
William Conti
All Pro Realty
The local track record
William Conti ranks #16 (tied) by homes listed and #19 by asking volume in Watertown, among 285 agents and teams, with 3 homes listed and $3.7M in asking volume. Median listing price in Watertown: NA. Figures cover Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
Published geographic standings
Where this agent stands out
Citywide totals include qualifying neighborhood homes. Each geography has its own ranking; these rows are not added together.
| Area / reporting period | Homes listed | Listing rank | Asking volume | Volume rank | Median listing price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WatertownBoston · CitywideNov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026 | 3 | T-16of 285 | $3.7M | #19 | NA3 priced homes |
| Allston ↗Boston · NeighborhoodNov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026 | 1 | T-28of 150 | $1.1M | #45 | NA1 priced home |
Asking prices, not completed sales. Median listing price requires at least 5 priced homes and 90% price coverage; otherwise NA.
Answers from the data
About William Conti’s listing activity
Where is William Conti most active?
Among the published areas shown for Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026, William Conti has the most credited homes in Watertown: 3. Citywide counts include qualifying neighborhood homes; geographic areas may overlap and are not added together.
Where does William Conti rank highest?
William Conti ranks #16 (tied) by homes listed and #19 by asking volume in Watertown, among 285 agents and teams, with 3 homes listed and $3.7M in asking volume. Median listing price in Watertown: NA. Figures cover Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
How does William Conti rank in Watertown?
William Conti ranks #16 (tied) by homes listed and #19 by asking volume in Watertown, with 3 homes listed and $3.7M in asking volume from Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
What is William Conti’s median listing price in Watertown?
NA. A median listing price needs at least five priced homes and prices for at least 90% of the credited homes in Watertown from Nov 2, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026.
How do citywide and neighborhood rankings relate?
Each area has its own ranking. A citywide count includes the agent’s qualifying homes inside that city, including its neighborhoods. Do not add neighborhood counts to the city total. A city boundary is different from the wider metropolitan area. These figures measure observed listing activity, not completed sales or service quality. Coverage is not complete MLS coverage.
View source and methodology ↗Loading current property availability…
How the listing data works
Scope & sources
What these figures tell you
Cribber measures observed listing representation using published geographic standings. Homes listed are distinct eligible properties credited to this agent or team; co-listed properties credit each named agent.
Asking volume uses listing asking prices and does not represent completed sales. Rankings do not measure service quality, buyer representation or negotiation outcomes. Coverage is not complete MLS coverage.
Keep the periods separate
Ranking dates appear with each area. Current property availability is separate from the published ranking. Historical samples, where available, carry their own dates and are not a complete career record.
Read the ranking methodology ↗