Top Real Estate Agents in South Loop, Chicago, IL

October 2026 · Ranked by observed listing activity over 12 months

Data through · Updated monthly · Edition details

South Loop at a glance

659 agents & teams · 941 homes

Based on Cribber’s trailing-12-month listing-activity data, Nadine L Ferrata ranks first in South Loop, Chicago, IL with 20 credited listings.

Leading agents by observed listing activity, Oct 30, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026.

Most listings

  1. 1Nadine L Ferrata20 listings
  2. 2Matt Laricy18 listings
  3. 3Robert Yoshimura13 listings

Highest asking volume

  1. 1Nadine L Ferrata$16.4M
  2. 2Matt Laricy$8.5M
  3. 3Robert Yoshimura$6.3M

A home’s history does not end when it leaves the market. Cribber keeps qualifying past listings in the comparison, helping you see an agent’s broader listing record over time. How rankings work

Agent leaderboard

659 agents · Sorted by listings

Agents in South Loop. Select Listings or Asking volume to sort highest first. Observed listing share uses 941 unique homes.
RankAgent / teamObserved
listing share
T-20Timothy RhotenRed Carpet Investment Group In4$1.7M
T-20Alex StoykovCOMPASS4$1.6M
T-20Joe Luzaj & Lauren De KostaArea606 Properties, LLC4$1.5M
T-20John O'connorTop Care Realty LLC4$1.4M
T-25Ryan HardyJameson Sotheby's International Realty3$3.8M
T-25Phil MossBaird & Warner Gold Coast3$3M
T-25Stephanie Kramer@properties Downers Grove3$2M
T-25Jacqueline Harris ColandoRedfin Corporation3$1.9M
T-25Nicole CreadyBaird & Warner Gold Coast3$1.7M
T-25Ken ReederBaird & Warner Gold Coast3$1.7M
T-25Ben LalezCOMPASS3$1.4M
T-25Eli MasudCOMPASS3$1.3M
T-25Maria Delboccio@properties Arlington Heights3$1.3M
T-25Kate WaddellCOMPASS3$1.2M
T-25Ray AndreyevConcentric Realty, Inc3$1.2M
T-25Michael MichalakRE MAX 10 Lincoln Park3$1.2M
T-25Ashley LeakeyBaird & Warner3$1.1M
T-25Tatiana PerryBerkshire Hathaway HomeServices Chicago3$1.1M
T-25Sophia KlopasJameson Sotheby's International Realty3$1.1M
T-25Susan DickmanBerkshire Hathaway HomeServices Chicago - Michigan Avenue Office3$983K

Ranks are calculated across all 659 agents. Tied agents share a rank, including across pages.

Reading the rankings

Listings
Distinct qualifying homes credited to an agent or team during the reporting window. Current and past listings contribute under the same rules; co-listing agents each receive credit.
Asking volume
The combined selected observed asking prices of credited homes. A volume rank requires a usable asking price for every qualifying home.
Observed listing share
Credited homes ÷ 941 unique homes in this leaderboard. Co-listing credits overlap, so shares can total more than 100%. The denominator is this edition’s qualifying homes.

About the data

October 2026 edition

Reporting window
–
Coverage
659 agents & teams · 941 unique homes
Published
Data cutoff

Updated monthly. This edition preserves its published figures; daily ingestion does not change these rankings.

Methodology & supporting evidence

What counts as a listing?

Ranked by distinct homes credited over the trailing 12 months, including both endpoint UTC dates. Qualifying current and past sale listings contribute when their selected listing episode overlaps the reporting window. Recorded sales identify sold homes within that listing record; other off-market homes remain inactive.

How are agents credited?

A canonical, unit-aware property identity keeps repeat observations of the same home from becoming extra credits. The agents-listings-v7 reader selects the latest qualifying episode before geographic filters. Explicit distinct co-listing agents each receive full credit. Named teams can receive documented credit; team or brokerage membership alone does not create it. Ambiguous attribution is withheld.

How are areas defined?

Municipalities use official Census boundaries and coordinate assignments. Neighborhoods use retained high-confidence polygon assignments. A home may appear in its city and neighborhood comparisons, once within each geography.

How do ties and share work?

The authoritative reader orders Homes Listed by credited homes, with asking volume and stable agent identity resolving display order. Equal listing counts share a competition rank, including across pages. Observed listing share is credited homes divided by unique eligible homes in the edition; co-listing credits can overlap.

How are asking prices measured?

Asking Volume adds the latest usable observed asking price associated with each selected episode. A volume rank requires 100% usable price coverage. These are asking prices rather than recorded sale proceeds. Homes with missing prices still count toward Homes Listed. Typical Asking Price describes the stored median and priced-home sample; historical price-based standings retain their original five-home and 90% coverage eligibility policy.

When is the leaderboard updated?

Each geography freezes the first successful verified capture for its UTC monthly edition. Read the actual reporting window, cutoff and publication date on the page. Daily ingestion prepares evidence separately. Published historical figures are preserved; a correction creates a new revision.

How can I verify this comparison?

Each comparison covers the geography, reporting window and qualifying records stated in the edition. Supporting listings show the evidence behind the figures. Payment never changes eligibility, counts or rank.

Calculation: agents-listings-v7. Publication: 813. Quality checks: passed.

Sources & reuse

Cite this leaderboard

Cribber. Top Real Estate Agents in South Loop, Chicago, IL. October 2026 edition. Listings and asking volume, Oct 30, 2025–Oct 30, 2026. Published Oct 30, 2026.

Leaderboard downloads

The same dated edition, ready to read or analyze.

Markdown is readable text. JSON includes ranking data, dates, definitions, and evidence links.

Leaderboard editions

Explore the published monthly record.

Explore nearby leaderboards

Compare agents across cities and neighborhoods.

Explore South Loop →

Welcome back.

Sign in to your Cribber account.

New to Cribber?

By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy.