Top Real Estate Agents in Fourth Ward, Charlotte, NC

October 2026 · Ranked by observed listing activity over 12 months

Data through · Updated monthly · Edition details

Fourth Ward at a glance

197 agents & teams · 261 homes

Based on Cribber’s trailing-12-month listing-activity data, Scott Russo ranks first in Fourth Ward, Charlotte, NC with 7 credited listings.

Leading agents by observed listing activity, Oct 27, 2025 – Oct 27, 2026.

Most listings

  1. 1Scott Russo7 listings
  2. T-2Sandy Kindbom6 listings
  3. T-2Randall Cernohorsky6 listings

Highest asking volume

  1. 1Scott Russo$6.5M
  2. 2Shane Mcdevitt$5M
  3. 3Sandy Kindbom$4.6M

A home’s history does not end when it leaves the market. Cribber keeps qualifying past listings in the comparison, helping you see an agent’s broader listing record over time. How rankings work

Agent leaderboard

197 agents · Sorted by listings

Agents in Fourth Ward. Select Listings or Asking volume to sort highest first. Observed listing share uses 261 unique homes.
RankAgent / teamObserved
listing share
1Scott RussoThe McDevitt Agency7$6.5M
T-2Sandy KindbomHoward Hanna Allen Tate-Charlotte-Center City6$4.6M
T-2Randall CernohorskyThe McDevitt Agency6$3.7M
T-4Shane McdevittThe McDevitt Agency5$5M
T-4Matt StoneStone Realty Group5$1.7M
T-6Matthew AlexanderPremier Sotheby's International Realty3$2.7M
T-6Tiffany MotonHoward Hanna Allen Tate-Charlotte-Center City3$1.2M
T-6Matt ClaxtonMy Townhome LLC3$1.2M
T-6Randi S FeldmanEXP Realty LLC3$891.5K
T-6Tj LarsenMy Townhome - My Maison Realty3$739.5K
T-11Charisma SoutherlandHoward Hanna Allen Tate-Charlotte-Center City2$3.1M
T-11Michelle KiddCOMPASS2$2.5M
T-11Abigail Hines MillerThe Agency - Charlotte2$1.9M
T-11Yancey RealtyYancey Realty2$1.3M
T-11Margo PottsYork Ventures, LLC2$1.1M
T-11Kevin CarlisleChurch Street Realty2$1M
T-11Mark DrabbleEnglish Mark Realty LLC2$980K
T-11Todd WisePremier Sotheby's International Realty2$978K
T-11Misty HurdCorcoran HM Properties2$973.9K
T-11David CookPremier Sotheby's International Realty2$953K

Showing 1–20 of 197 agents

Understanding these numbers ↓

Ranks are calculated across all 197 agents. Tied agents share a rank, including across pages.

Reading the rankings

Listings
Distinct qualifying homes credited to an agent or team during the reporting window. Current and past listings contribute under the same rules; co-listing agents each receive credit.
Asking volume
The combined selected observed asking prices of credited homes. A volume rank requires a usable asking price for every qualifying home.
Observed listing share
Credited homes ÷ 261 unique homes in this leaderboard. Co-listing credits overlap, so shares can total more than 100%. The denominator is this edition’s qualifying homes.

About the data

October 2026 edition

Reporting window
–
Coverage
197 agents & teams · 261 unique homes
Published
Data cutoff

Updated monthly. This edition preserves its published figures; daily ingestion does not change these rankings.

Methodology & supporting evidence

What counts as a listing?

Ranked by distinct homes credited over the trailing 12 months, including both endpoint UTC dates. Qualifying current and past sale listings contribute when their selected listing episode overlaps the reporting window. Recorded sales identify sold homes within that listing record; other off-market homes remain inactive.

How are agents credited?

A canonical, unit-aware property identity keeps repeat observations of the same home from becoming extra credits. The agents-listings-v7 reader selects the latest qualifying episode before geographic filters. Explicit distinct co-listing agents each receive full credit. Named teams can receive documented credit; team or brokerage membership alone does not create it. Ambiguous attribution is withheld.

How are areas defined?

Municipalities use official Census boundaries and coordinate assignments. Neighborhoods use retained high-confidence polygon assignments. A home may appear in its city and neighborhood comparisons, once within each geography.

How do ties and share work?

The authoritative reader orders Homes Listed by credited homes, with asking volume and stable agent identity resolving display order. Equal listing counts share a competition rank, including across pages. Observed listing share is credited homes divided by unique eligible homes in the edition; co-listing credits can overlap.

How are asking prices measured?

Asking Volume adds the latest usable observed asking price associated with each selected episode. A volume rank requires 100% usable price coverage. These are asking prices rather than recorded sale proceeds. Homes with missing prices still count toward Homes Listed. Typical Asking Price describes the stored median and priced-home sample; historical price-based standings retain their original five-home and 90% coverage eligibility policy.

When is the leaderboard updated?

Each geography freezes the first successful verified capture for its UTC monthly edition. Read the actual reporting window, cutoff and publication date on the page. Daily ingestion prepares evidence separately. Published historical figures are preserved; a correction creates a new revision.

How can I verify this comparison?

Each comparison covers the geography, reporting window and qualifying records stated in the edition. Supporting listings show the evidence behind the figures. Payment never changes eligibility, counts or rank.

Calculation: agents-listings-v7. Publication: 143. Quality checks: passed.

Sources & reuse

Cite this leaderboard

Cribber. Top Real Estate Agents in Fourth Ward, Charlotte, NC. October 2026 edition. Listings and asking volume, Oct 27, 2025–Oct 27, 2026. Published Oct 30, 2026.

Leaderboard downloads

The same dated edition, ready to read or analyze.

Markdown is readable text. JSON includes ranking data, dates, definitions, and evidence links.

Leaderboard editions

Explore the published monthly record.

Explore nearby leaderboards

Compare agents across cities and neighborhoods.

Explore Fourth Ward →

Welcome back.

Sign in to your Cribber account.

New to Cribber?

By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy.