Top Real Estate Agents in Mount Hood, Melrose, MA

October 2026 · Ranked by observed listing activity over 12 months

Data through · Updated monthly · Edition details

Mount Hood at a glance

17 agents & teams · 22 homes

Based on Cribber’s trailing-12-month listing-activity data, Leeman & Gately ranks first in Mount Hood, Melrose, MA with 4 credited listings.

Leading agents by observed listing activity, Oct 27, 2025 – Oct 27, 2026.

Most listings

  1. 1Leeman & Gately4 listings
  2. T-2Waypoint Realty Group2 listings
  3. T-2The Kim Perrotti Team2 listings

Highest asking volume

  1. 1Leeman & Gately$4.6M
  2. 2Waypoint Realty Group$4.5M
  3. T-3The Kim Perrotti Team$1.7M
  4. T-3Mission Realty Advisors$1.7M

A home’s history does not end when it leaves the market. Cribber keeps qualifying past listings in the comparison, helping you see an agent’s broader listing record over time. How rankings work

Agent leaderboard

17 agents · Sorted by listings

Agents in Mount Hood. Select Listings or Asking volume to sort highest first. Observed listing share uses 22 unique homes.
RankAgent / teamObserved
listing share
1Leeman & GatelyCOMPASS4$4.6M
T-2Waypoint Realty GroupColdwell Banker Realty - Charlestown2$4.5M
T-2The Kim Perrotti TeamLeading Edge Real Estate2$1.7M
T-4Mission Realty AdvisorsCOMPASS1$1.7M
T-4Sanderson NascimentoReal Broker Ma, Llc1$1.6M
T-4Dale BrousseauTrinity Real Estate1$1.4M
T-4Kristin GennettiCentury 21 North East1$1.3M
T-4Harshini JoshiKeller Williams Realty Boston Northwest1$1.2M
T-4The Dipietro And Bekkenhuis GroupLaer Realty Partners1$1.2M
T-4Martha TotiColdwell Banker Realty - Charlestown1$995K
T-4Bill ButlerLeading Edge Real Estate1$899K
T-4Mike QuailGibson Sotheby's International Realty1$880K
T-4Keith LittlefieldLittlefield Real Estate, LLC1$875K
T-4The Apex TeamApex Realty Group, Llc1$749K
T-4Anne TithRedfin Corp.1$699.9K
T-4Terri MaffeoLaer Realty Partners1$699.9K
T-4Romeo ZeqoBest Boston Realty, Llc1$650K

Showing 1–17 of 17 agents

Understanding these numbers ↓

Ranks are calculated across all 17 agents. Tied agents share a rank, including across pages.

Reading the rankings

Listings
Distinct qualifying homes credited to an agent or team during the reporting window. Current and past listings contribute under the same rules; co-listing agents each receive credit.
Asking volume
The combined selected observed asking prices of credited homes. A volume rank requires a usable asking price for every qualifying home.
Observed listing share
Credited homes ÷ 22 unique homes in this leaderboard. Co-listing credits overlap, so shares can total more than 100%. The denominator is this edition’s qualifying homes.

About the data

October 2026 edition

Reporting window
–
Coverage
17 agents & teams · 22 unique homes
Published
Data cutoff

Updated monthly. This edition preserves its published figures; daily ingestion does not change these rankings.

Methodology & supporting evidence

What counts as a listing?

Ranked by distinct homes credited over the trailing 12 months, including both endpoint UTC dates. Qualifying current and past sale listings contribute when their selected listing episode overlaps the reporting window. Recorded sales identify sold homes within that listing record; other off-market homes remain inactive.

How are agents credited?

A canonical, unit-aware property identity keeps repeat observations of the same home from becoming extra credits. The agents-listings-v7 reader selects the latest qualifying episode before geographic filters. Explicit distinct co-listing agents each receive full credit. Named teams can receive documented credit; team or brokerage membership alone does not create it. Ambiguous attribution is withheld.

How are areas defined?

Municipalities use official Census boundaries and coordinate assignments. Neighborhoods use retained high-confidence polygon assignments. A home may appear in its city and neighborhood comparisons, once within each geography.

How do ties and share work?

The authoritative reader orders Homes Listed by credited homes, with asking volume and stable agent identity resolving display order. Equal listing counts share a competition rank, including across pages. Observed listing share is credited homes divided by unique eligible homes in the edition; co-listing credits can overlap.

How are asking prices measured?

Asking Volume adds the latest usable observed asking price associated with each selected episode. A volume rank requires 100% usable price coverage. These are asking prices rather than recorded sale proceeds. Homes with missing prices still count toward Homes Listed. Typical Asking Price describes the stored median and priced-home sample; historical price-based standings retain their original five-home and 90% coverage eligibility policy.

When is the leaderboard updated?

Each geography freezes the first successful verified capture for its UTC monthly edition. Read the actual reporting window, cutoff and publication date on the page. Daily ingestion prepares evidence separately. Published historical figures are preserved; a correction creates a new revision.

How can I verify this comparison?

Each comparison covers the geography, reporting window and qualifying records stated in the edition. Supporting listings show the evidence behind the figures. Payment never changes eligibility, counts or rank.

Calculation: agents-listings-v7. Publication: 278. Quality checks: passed.

Sources & reuse

Cite this leaderboard

Cribber. Top Real Estate Agents in Mount Hood, Melrose, MA. October 2026 edition. Listings and asking volume, Oct 27, 2025–Oct 27, 2026. Published Oct 30, 2026.

Leaderboard downloads

The same dated edition, ready to read or analyze.

Markdown is readable text. JSON includes ranking data, dates, definitions, and evidence links.

Welcome back.

Sign in to your Cribber account.

New to Cribber?

By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service and acknowledge our Privacy Policy.